My new online project...

Friday, 2 December 2011

The meaning of Clarkson

Jeremy Clarkson is not a name unfamiliar in Poland; his books and TV shows are available here in translation; Świat wedłu Clarksona (four volumes of the stuff) is a concept that many Poles will have come into contact with in their native language.

The man has made his name and his fortune driving expensive cars around public roads while pressing the loud pedal. His forthright views on matters unrelated to the ignition of fossil fuels in the pursuit of thrills are often hilarious. His ranty writing style inspires rank-and-file bloggers in a way that only Bill Bryson can better.

So. On Wednesday, Britain's public sector went out on strike (well, some of them). Jeremy Clarkson said on BBC television:
"Frankly, I'd have them all shot. I would take them outside and execute them in front of their families. I mean, how dare they go on strike when they have these gilt-edged pensions that are going to be guaranteed while the rest of us have to work for a living?"
Obvious uproar. Over 21,000 complaints to the BBC. The main public sector trade union has called for his sacking. Even the prime minister, David Cameron, said to be a personal friend of Clarkson's, was forced to comment ("a silly thing to say... I'm sure he didn't mean it").

It will blow over, but will not be forgotten. However, Clarkson (though he probably doesn't twig) does has a serious point. The British public sector has become an economic absurdity, and economic absurdities in the long run face correction. The bigger the absurdity, the bigger the correction.

Amid the outrage, that point has been lost. Over the Blair-Brown years, the UK's public sector has been silently bloating, soaking up the slack in the labour market caused by 1.7 million manufacturing jobs heading east. Paid for at first by GDP growth and windfalls such as the sale of 3G licences netting £23 billion in 2000, this scheme started becoming unworkable as recession struck in 2008/9; since then, these additional public sector jobs (and their attendant pension schemes) were increasingly paid for out of debt.

Now, many British public sector workers are living a life of entitlement ("I'm doing the public a service, so the taxpayer owes me"). Well, nie do końca. It's time to count the cost. In Poland, for example, the minister of administration, Michał Boni, has calculated that it costs 50 złotys to administer 50 złotys of state benefits. This will have to change if Poland is to escape the fate of Greece and Italy. Britain is much further down the road to ruin than Poland (which as least has plausible growth scenarios to keep investors interested). Britain's public sector workers need to wake up to that unpleasant reality.

Until relatively recently, Britain was a land of pubs full of laughter, informed conversation and cigarette smoke. Each pub would have its own Jeremy Clarkson holding forth at the bar after three pints of Old Nutkin and commenting wittily upon the affairs of the day. Today, Britain's pubs tend to be joyless, sterile and half-empty places; the nation instead imbibes Herr Lidl's 3-month-old 'Don Pedro' whisky-style beverage at home in front of 46" TV sets. This, I think, rather explains the Clarkson phenomenon - we still need our public house pundits.

Sadly though, Clarkson is outliving his usefulness. How much of Britain's economic woe is the result of consumers believing that they were entitled to purchase that car Clarkson drooled over on Top Gear. He should give up driving expensive cars; instead, he should go to his nearest adult education college and study for a Higher National Diploma in economics. Then, he'll be able to apply his ready wit to affairs of state with at least some underpinnings of theoretical knowledge. Instinctively he's right - but his lack of gravitas now sits uncomfortably upon a man of his age.

This time last year:
Today, not so good.

This time two years ago:
In which I walk to work

This time four years ago:
Act 1, Scene 1, a blasted heath

9 comments:

  1. @Michael
    This 'Well, nie do końca' thing is so beatifully typical of you! Things like this make me feel happy indeed to be your good kolega.

    ReplyDelete
  2. In the old days the public sector workers earnt less than the private sector and was compensated by jobs for life security and gold plated inflation proofed final salary pensions. Indeed it was quite common for the incompetent workers to be promoted in the final years so that they would get a higher pension.

    However thanks to the depradations which Gordon Brown inflicted on England in belated Scots retaliation for Culloden public sector pay leapfrogged the private sector. Now that the government has suggested that the public sector should shoulder part of the pain the trade unionists (not many of these rare creatures left in the private sector) call out their mindless members on strike.

    Shooting is probably too good for them.

    On expensive cars and Clarkson there is an interesting comment by the Major of London Boris Jihnson in todays Torygraph!!

    Now all I have to do is find the grease monkey who failed to tighten the wheel nuts on my 16 year old Land Rover Discovery. Coming onto the most Siekierkowski I felt slack in the steering and managed to stop just as the last wheel nut was working loose. The excellent break down truck driver from PZU managed to find four of the nuts!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Apropos I found this comment regarding Clarkson's remarks (also on the torygraph) and it puts the matter into a wholly different light:

    >Nick Eriksen
    12/02/2011 12:16 AM
    What a pity the Telegraph has chosen to selectively edit Clarkson's comments in order to distort what he actually said and thus deceive its readership. Not very good or honest journalism, is it?

    When first asked if he thought the strikes were a good idea Clarkson began by PRAISING them ("I think they have been fantastic"). Only after this does he remark that as the BBC was supposed to be impartial he would have to balance those comments, and therefore then castigated the strikers, as we can see in the video.

    The point is that he was seeking to be balanced - in a humorous way. Maybe you don't believe he was funny. Fair enough, humour is a very personal thing. But he was not trying to demonise the strikers, merely balance his previous favourable comments with some opposing ones.

    Get it now? Good. Then calm down and get a life.<

    Talk about a storm in a teacup, eh?

    ReplyDelete
  4. @adthelad
    That's absolutely fantastic! And oh so typical. So very typical.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I believe Nick Erikson is either thick or deliberately trying to mislead. Clarkson was being sarcastic in the extreme (the harking back to the '70s bit). @ AdTheLad, @ toyah, read the ENTIRE transcript -
    here.

    ReplyDelete
  6. @MD
    http://www.twitlonger.com/show/efsqnv

    I have read it, and I have watched it, and as far as I can tell he was indeed being sarcastic and it was funny. Can't understand the problem.

    Just recently there has further annoyance at Clarkson for branding those who commit suicide under trains as being selfish, but it was the strikers comment that has everyone up in uproar.

    Political correctness GONE MAD!!

    ReplyDelete
  7. @Mike
    He is being sarcastic both ways. And that's what makes him different from you. You know only one way ahead

    ReplyDelete
  8. @MD ...I do see your point though regarding the public purse's 'predicament' with the public sector.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Clarkson is an example of much that is wrong with Britain - a loud privileged fool who has nothing to say but does so anyway to the lowest common denominator of the mass - the moron who drove a 4WD to the top of a Scottish mountain 'because he could'.

    I had the experience of applying for a public sector management job a couple of years ago. Sure the pension was OK - but the salary was so low that I would have been better off driving a train or even selling tickets to ride on one.

    What a laugh to read a comment about 'Scottish retribution' for some 18th century skirmish. Why is it that Eastern Europeans are so keen to criticise other nations? Because their own are so perfect?

    Oh, and remember that one big reason why Poland is 'doing well' (other than,as this blog tells us, public transport is crap, roads are full of holes and people can't get mortgages) is that half a million of you are over here working (and often paying no tax) whilst the British taxpayer bleeds to pay social security for half a million British unemployed.

    But of course it's easy to bite the hand that feeds...

    ReplyDelete