News from Rynek Kolejowy has set Polish rail users chattering on social media – at long last, state-owned rail-infrastructure operator PKP PLK looks like it might be changing the awkward way that Polish station platforms are numbered.
I have written about this many times before; this is one of the remaining absurdities on the Polish rail network, which has improved beyond recognition over the past 15 years.
The problem is that each platform edge, which in most countries around the world is simply called a 'platform', is identified in Poland by a combination of track (tor) and platform (peron) numbers.
Let's take a simple example; Warszawa Centralna (Warsaw Central station). The current nomenclature is as follows: Tor 7 Peron 1; Tor 5 Peron 1 – Tor 3 Peron 2; Tor 1 Peron 2 – Tor 2 Peron 3; Tor 4 Peron 3, then Tor 6 Peron 4 and finally Tor 8 Peron 4. When a train is announced, the announcer will say, in English, for example, "The train for Berlin Gesundbrunnen is departing from Track 2 Platform 3" or "The train for Vilnius is departing from Track 3 Platform 2." It is easy to get confused! In any other country, these eight platform edges would simply be numbered Platforms 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8.
The problem is particularly acute at larger stations. It has twice caused me to miss connecting trains at Poznań Główny, for example. Below: Platform 11, Track 58 and Platform 11 Track 56 (where's Track 57?). Under the proposed system, these would simply become two separately numbered platforms – perhaps Platforms 15 and 16. No more need to remember both a platform as well as a track number!
Left: fragment of printed timetable at Poznań Główny. Next to the departure time is the peron number, with the tor number beneath it. The trouble is that the loudspeaker announcements give the tor number first, followed by the peron number („Pociąg do stacji Wągrowiec odjedzie z toru ósmego przy peronie drugim”). While the printed timetables have gone over to Arabic from Roman numerals for peron numbers in 2024, the online timetable (rozkład-pkp.pl) still uses Roman numerals! (So right now, the local train for Wągrowiec is shown as departing Poznań Główny from IV/12).
Three days ago, PKP PLK announced that after completing the modernisation of Mysłowice station on 25 October, it will be renumbering its three physical platforms serving five tracks as five separately numbered platform edges for passenger-information purposes (below). The trial is scheduled to expand on 13 December to Milówka, Sól, Rajcza, Skarżysko-Kamienna and Środa Wielkopolska stations. A nationwide rollout is not yet confirmed; PKP PLK will evaluate the pilot, including passenger surveys, before deciding whether to extend it.
PKP PLK appears finally to have accepted long-standing suggestions from rail users: the numbering of tracks does not need to be communicated to passengers. Below: classic example of this nonsense. Lublin Główny station. Technical track numbering isn't irrational (someone once explained it to me) – railway workers need to know this for operational purposes. It's simply inappropriate as the primary means of directing passengers.
Below: the absurdity reaches its peak in the Tri-City, where the SKM trains between Gdańsk and Gdynia use tracks 501 and 502. No doubt some railway professional can explain the logic (like, why not 401 and 402 or 201 and 202?) Let's just double-check the platform numbers on our phones as we walk down these steps...
My own local absurdity at Chynów station is the fact that there are two platforms, three platform edges, numbered Tor 4 Peron 2, Tor 2 Peron 2 and Tor 1 Peron 1. Where's Tor 3?
Polish railways are better than ever, but could still improve. I get on average three emails a week from Koleje Mazowieckie informing me of delays on the Radom line, subject line, Utrudnienia w ruchu pociągów. But then I do get these notifications, so at least there is a system.
I am a firm believer in the aggregation of marginal gains, the philosophy of British Olympic cycling coach, Sir David 'Dave' Brailsford. Introduce an innovation that shaves off a tenth of a second and no one notices. But introduce a hundred innovations, and you've made a potentially race-winning ten-second gain. The same principle applies to Poland's railways. Station signage, passenger information (digital displays and AI-generated loudspeaker announcements), signalling and control systems, new track and new rolling stock have all made travelling by train a far more pleasant experience than in the past. And by introducing logical platform numbering (from the passengers' point of view), another marginal improvement adds to the overall positive experience. And this drives passenger numbers, up 7.7% in 2025 over 2024, which in turn justifies further investment. A virtuous circle.
PKP PLK appears finally to have accepted long-standing suggestions from rail users: the numbering of tracks does not need to be communicated to passengers. Railway workers have good reasons for retaining their own system of track numbering. But what use is that information to someone changing trains, possibly in a hurry, who simply wants to know where to stand? Let the railway engineers keep their track numbers. Passengers just need platform numbers.
This time last year:
A man's wealth expressed in cats
[Since then, my wealth has doubled!]
This time three years ago:
Why Poland can no longer afford PiS
This time four years ago:
A slower, drabber, greener, more local way of life might yet save us all
This time five years ago:
Warka's bi-weekly market
This time six years ago:
How's your samopoczucie?
[Still sign of it. In 2022 it was promised for 2026. They lied.]
On relevance and irrelevance
Apple time south of Warsaw
This time 12 years ago:
Poland gets anglicised as Britain gets polonised
This time 13 years ago:
Ale, architecture and city politics
This time 14 years ago:
The pros and cons of roadside acoustic screens
This time 15 years ago:
Moaning about trains again
[haha! Have a look at this post to see just how much has changed!]
This time 16 years ago:
Warsaw street names – Dolna, Polna, Rolna, Wolna, Smolna. Lost?
This time 18 years ago:
Ditches, landscapes, autumn
This time 19 years ago:
Golden autumn in Łazienki park





I understand how this is a problem for someone used to the English system, but at the same time it's funny how this is a complete non-issue for me. I grew up with the platform/track/section system and it always seemed logical as it mapped to the physical world: platform meaning the platform, not its edge.
ReplyDeleteTake the design of Warszawa Śródmieście PKP: two tracks, 3 platforms, and 4 platform edges. The train is on a track that can be accessed from two platforms. I think Germany and other central European countries have (or had) this system too.
I don't mind Roman numerals either, but I hate exceptions in the printed schedules: these little letters indices that tell you that this train/bus does not run on such and such days, etc.
The actual numbering of the tracks does not matter to me - they can be non-sequential or weird for historical reasons. I never took a wrong train because of the track numbering in Poland. I took a wrong train once, long ago, in winter, when the destination name was shown only on the front of the train and it was obscured by snow and the wrong train showed up when my train should have been there.
I took wrong trains plenty of time abroad though. Usually wrong direction metro or suburban train.
In Poland you have to watch out for last minute platform changes. It doesn't happen as often as it used to, but I always start being very suspicious when the scheduled time comes and my train is not there, but some train is pulling into another platform.
What really makes by blood boil in regards to the train station design is the lack of accessibility: huge gaps or steps between doors and platforms (hello Riga), lack of escalators and lifts (old Warsaw and London stations), broken lifts (Brisbane, Warsaw), lifts too small for a standard bike (new Warsaw stations), etc.
One more thing that irks me with new stations in Poland, like Warszawa Zachodnia, is how small the English text is. It didn't use to be like that and it doesn't need to be like that. It just feels like malice. Plus, I think on international train stations there used to be a 3rd language, Russian.
Haha! I can see a nostalgicists' backlash with people playing back old-school station announcements with Track/Platform numbers and waxing lyrical over how the new-fangled platform-edge-only numbers no longer have that romantic ring to them... Zapowiedzi pociągów (IVONA) z transkrypcją
ReplyDeleteChatGPT suggests that only Poland, Czechia, Slovakia, Croatia and Serbia use this numbering system. Austro-Hungarian hangover? Nope, Austria and Hungary (and indeed Germany) have regular platform-edge-only numbers.
Re: other languages: in recent weeks, the new FLIRT stock on Koleje Mazowieckie has been playing in-train announcements in Polish, English and Ukrainian. Also, I watched a video about the Trans-Siberian Express made in January 2026, which showed the station signs along the line conforming with international (EIC?) norms in terms of colour and typeface... in Russian and... ENGLISH!
Agree about level-access to all platforms.
I'm quite sure I've seen Gleis (track) numbers when I was in Berlin recently. :-)
ReplyDeleteGermany does indeed use track numbers, but on their own, not in combination with platform numbers. These can be seen a Świnoujście Centrum station (Gleis 32 and Gleis 31),
ReplyDeleteIn and out of Germany, via Świnoujście