The confirmation, once sent, seemed to settle the matter. There were other wires that morning, and more the next; Liverpool responded, and arrangements were set in motion with a satisfactory speed. A vessel was engaged out of the Mersey, not the first choice but adequate; rail carriage was secured for the salt from Cheshire; the papers began to take shape – invoice, draft bill of lading, the financial instruments by which such a trade was given its formal existence.
For a few days the business ran as expected. The figures held. Gormally allowed himself, in private, the thought that the margin might exceed his first calculation.
It was on the fourth day that the first irregularity appeared.
A telegram from Liverpool, brief and not entirely clear, spoke of delay in loading. Labour, it said, was uncertain. There had been disturbances on the line bringing wagons into the docks. The message was written in a hand not usually employed by their correspondent there, and bore a time mark that suggested it had been transmitted later than it ought.
Kuhn read it and placed it beside the others. “Ask for particulars,” he said.
Gormally did so. The reply, when it came, added little. There had been interference on the railway somewhere to the south; wagons had not arrived in sequence; the docks were crowded. It would, they said, be resolved shortly.
“Everything is shortly,” said Kuhn. “Until it is not.”
Gormally said nothing. He had already begun to reckon the days. Fourteen, from the time of confirmation. They had lost one in the exchange of messages, another in the arrangements. There was still room, but less than he would have liked.
He sent another wire, urging expedition, offering a small consideration for priority in loading. It was agreed to, though not without complaint. Money, he had learned, could hasten most things, though not always enough. He was at the mercy of tide and turn. A swift decision: rather than waiting for a steamer direct to Hamburg, the salt could be dispatched immediately to Ostend, and from there, by express freight rail to its destination. Gormally looked at the ledger, mentally scratching out the profit. This would eat significantly into Kuhn's margin, but would save the deal.
Two days passed. Then came the message that altered the complexion of the affair.
It did not come from Liverpool, but from the Continent, relayed through a line they did not commonly use. The address was that of a house in Luxembourg with which Kuhn had had occasional dealings – an intermediary in matters of credit, rather than of goods.
Gormally broke the seal and read.
RAILWAY INTERRUPTION BELGIAN LINE STOP TRAFFIC DELAYED STOP ADVISE POSITION SHIPMENT STOP
He took it at once to Kuhn.
“Belgium?” said Kuhn. “That is not our route.”
“It may become so,” said Gormally. “If they divert.”
Kuhn frowned. “Or if the information is second-hand. These relays they introduce their own errors.”
“Shall we reply?” said Gormally.
“Yes,” said Kuhn. “But say nothing we do not know.”
Gormally wrote stating that loading was in progress, that dispatch would be made without delay, that further advice would follow. He did not mention the fourteen days.
The days continued to pass. The telegrams from Liverpool grew more frequent, but not more reassuring. Wagons arrived, but not in the numbers required; loading began, halted, began again. There was talk of men refusing to work, of lines blocked, of some disturbance further down the system which had spread, as such things do, beyond its point of origin.
Once, at a Lodge meeting, Gormally had heard the word spoken plainly. “Anarchists,” said a worshipful brother in a tone that was half contempt, half unease. “Blowing rails in the Ardennes, they say. Or threatening to. It amounts to the same thing.”
Gormally pondered that word. Anarchists. It seemed too imprecise to use in a telegram or to note down in the ledger. Yet the effect, whether the cause were as described or not, was real enough. The system upon which Kuhn had depended – the steady, ordered movement of goods and messages – had faltered.
On the twelfth day, the first portion of the cargo cleared the docks.
Gormally marked it in the book, the figures set down with care: tonnage, date, vessel. He felt a momentary relief. If the remainder followed promptly, they might yet meet the term, or come close enough to argue that they had done so in substance, if not in the strict letter.
On the thirteenth day, nothing moved.
On the fourteenth, a further consignment was loaded, but it was clear by then that the whole would not be shipped within the time named.
Kuhn stood at the desk as the figures were entered.
“We shall send what we have,” he said. “And we shall explain.”
Gormally nodded. It was all that could be done.
He drafted the message to Hamburg with more care than any he had yet composed. He set out the facts: the quantity shipped, the dates, the circumstances of delay. He did not use the word anarchists. He wrote instead of “interruption of traffic beyond our control,” and trusted that the phrase would carry what it needed to carry.
The reply came the following day, not from Hamburg directly, but again through the Luxembourg house.
HOLD YOU LIABLE LOSSES FAILURE COMPLY STRICT TERMS STOP CLAIM TO FOLLOW STOP
Kuhn read it, and for a long moment said nothing.
Gormally felt, with a clarity that was almost physical, the point at which the matter had turned. It was not the delay; that, though unfortunate, might have been borne. It was the word – strict – now set against them, no longer a part of a hurried exchange, but of a claim.
“They will say we accepted it,” said Kuhn at last.
Gormally did not answer.
Kuhn turned to him.
“You wrote it,” he said, not accusingly, but as one states a fact.
“Yes,” said Gormally.
“And you believed it?”
“I did,” said Gormally. Then, after a moment, “I do.”
Kuhn inclined his head, as though acknowledging the honesty of the reply, if not its substance.
“Then we must see what others will make of it,” he said.
The papers were gathered, the telegrams laid out in order, the bill drawn and accepted, the endorsements noted. Somewhere between London, Hamburg and the small Grand Duchy through which the dispute now ran, the matter would be read again, line by line, in a language not their own, and given a meaning that would bind them more firmly than any they had intended.
Part IV tomorrow.
This time last year:
A month on from my heart attack
This time four years ago:
Park+Ride for Jeziorki
This time five years ago:
Decimalisation and determination
This time nine years ago:
God, an Englishman, orders his Eden thus:
This time 11 years ago:
I buy a Nikon Coolpix A
This time 12 years ago:
More about the Ladder of Authority
This time 13 years ago:
By bike, south of Warsaw
This time 15 years ago:
Functionalist architecture in Warsaw
This time 16 years ago:
What's the Polish for 'to bully'?
This time 17 years ago:
Making plans
This time 18 years ago:
The setting sun stirs my soul
This time 19 years ago:
Rain ends the drought
March and April 2026: the driest since records began































